The New Left
THE NEW LEFT
The elites in the USA and elsewhere in the West determined
that they could enfeeble the political left, those who would challenge their
wealth and power for the benefit of the whole society, if the left were
transformed from a movement organized around the struggle of labor vs. capital
into a movement that would inevitably be divided against itself. So these elites provided support to such a
fundamentally divided version of the left, what is known as the "New
Left," which focused on the formation of and empowerment of competing
political identity groups, usually based on gender, race, or ethnicity.
The support was in part direct, but mostly indirect, as the elites
provided the New Left with access to mainstream media and the messages, ideas,
and values of the New Left were broadly spread, widely promoted, and sometimes
even celebrated. This was all done at
the expense of the Pro-Labor Left, which had posed a much greater threat to the
political-economic power structure, and over time the New Left supplanted the Pro-Labor
Left as the mainstream of the left.
This is problematic over the long term for any human society
at a fundamental level. It not only
insulates the elites from any serious challenges to their power, allowing
problems to fester and the rise of other abuses that follow from unchallenged
power, but most importantly it sets women against men, which can only lead over
the long term to social disintegration.
Men and women were designed by evolution to be different pieces of the
same puzzle, so that they would fit together with different needs and different
abilities to make a harmonious and healthy society that could survive over the
long term. When men and women are convinced that they are
competing groups and even enemies, then the myriad of interdependencies between
the sexes, some known and many unknown, that human societies have depended on
for survival throughout their hundreds of thousands of years of evolution are
severed, leading to innumerable unpredictable
ripple effects that could very easily cripple the society.
Humans evolved in small groups, and these small groups grew,
by various means, to become larger and larger groups over the evolution of
human civilization. The path to the
development of a large society with sufficient social harmony to be healthy and
sustainable has been long and torturous and only was achieved after much
experimentation with different rules of social behavior. Of course the social rules were often crafted
primarily for the benefit of elites, but often enough the elites crafting the
rules recognized that they would benefit from improving the general welfare of
the society, particularly in the societies that survived long term. Sometimes the rules were found to be
inconsistent with general welfare by later generations, or by those leading
rebellions in the same generation, and were overturned or modified, but this
was always best treated as a delicate process as over time human rules become
entangled with the values, belief systems, expectations, and patterns of
behavior that are common in the society and which members depend on as they
build and maintain the web of human life.
However, in the modern era, in the pursuit of their own narrow
short-term interests, elites in the West have promoted and empowered this New Left
which is radically changing social rules that human societies have depended on
to provide for the general welfare for millennia. The genie is out of the bottle as the New
Left movement may, soon if not already, become too powerful for those same
elites to control, with the consequence that all humans will suffer, including
the elites who enabled this process.